Previous: 1.3 Least Squares Method
Up: 1. Asserting
Next: 1.5 Summary
  Contents
Definition 1.4.1
The effects of a factor are, for a given model, the scores achieved
when replacing other factors by their average nominal value, i.e.
by 0. The influence of a factor is the difference between the extreme
effects.
Proposition 1.4.2
Let
be the column obtained from
when replacing by 0 everything
that is not related to this factor. Then product
is a
column containing the different effects of this factor (evenly repeated
for a balanced design and unevenly repeated otherwise).
Example 1.4.3
Concerning the DOE under study, we obtain :
- Tests where Sealing=plastic (code
) are, on the average, leading
to a T value greater by
than the constant term (
),
while tests where Sealing=brass (code
) are, on the average,
leading to a T value lower by
than the constant term. Hence
.
- Relative to Connection, the effects are
(crimped, code
),
(screwed, code
) and
(welded,
code
). Hence
.
- Relative to Engine, the effects are
(brass, code
),
(silver, code
) and
(CuNiSn, code
).
Hence
.
- Relative to Wire, the vector
is given by :
and the effects
(wire 1.5 X, code
),
(wire 1.5, code
) and so on. Hence
.
- Finally, the Pins effects are
,
,
and
. Hence
.
Remark 1.4.4
When a DOE is not balanced for a given factor, the weighted
average of the effects of this factor is not zero. Effects are added
to the constant term, not to the mean.
Example 1.4.5
Here, factors 1,4,5 are balanced and each average effect vanishes.
Concerning the other two, we have :
This is the reason why the constant term

differs from the
average

of experimental data. As it should be,

holds.
Definition 1.4.6
The "average effects graph" is what is obtained
by placing side by side the effects of all the factors (
1.4).
FIG. 1.4:
Average effects
|
|
Scilab 1.4.7
F
IG. 1.4 has been drawn using command
draw_influences,
L
ISTING ![[*]](/~douillet/gifs/crossref.gif)
.
Previous: 1.3 Least Squares Method
Up: 1. Asserting
Next: 1.5 Summary
  Contents
douillet@ensait.fr
2008-03-13