previous up next
Previous: 2 Notations and elementary Up: Is the Fibonacci Sequence Next: 4 Complements

Subsections


3 Sequences of squared terms

3.1 A 3-dimensional space

Let us now consider the set maths of all the squared terms sequences maths associated to a sequence maths. From Eq. 5, we have maths and therefore maths is a subset of the vector space maths generated by the geometric sequences maths, maths and maths. This 3-dimension vector space is the set of the sequences verifying the recurrence relation of third order whose characteristic polynomial is maths namely

maths (13)

The generating function of such a sequence maths has therefore the form

maths (14)

and it can be checked that the sequences defined in Eq. 3 are described by :

Sequence U V W
maths maths maths maths
maths maths maths maths
maths maths maths maths

Proposition 3  

When recurrence Eq. 4 is really a recurrence of second order (i.e. maths and maths), the vector space maths is spanned by maths, maths, maths if and only if vector space maths is spanned by maths.

Proof. Compute the determinant of maths and obtain maths. maths

3.2 Even and odd subsequences

Let us now consider the even and odd subsequences maths and maths defined by maths and maths. In the general case, their generating functions can be obtained by

maths

but here, we have obviously :

maths (15)

Being expandable in the geometric basis, both maths and maths belong to the vector space maths and therefore are expandable in the maths basis. Going back from generating function to the corresponding sequences, we obtain  :

Theorem 1  

Let maths be a non-geometric sequence verifying a linear recurrence of second order. Let maths be the roots of the characteristic polynomial. Then for all maths :

maths maths maths (16)
maths maths maths  

In equation Eq. 16, the quantities maths and maths were only introduced to obtain more "cosmetic" formulae. When eliminating the cross term (and re expanding maths and maths), a nice formula is obtained :

Theorem 2  

When maths verifies the hypotheses of thm:even-odd then, for all maths :

maths (17)

In the genuine Fibonacci case, this result is the formerly stated relation Eq. 2.


3.3 Essentially different relations cannot be found

In order to see if other relations of this kind can be found, we have to understand why relation Eq. 17 holds. On the left side, we have a linear combination of squared terms. The poles involved in the corresponding generating function are maths. On the right side, we have a combination of terms coming from "arithmetic subsequences", i.e. maths. But, from Eq. 5, we have :

Proposition 4  

For fixed maths, all the arithmetic subsequences obey to the same linear recurrence of order 2, whose poles are maths and maths.

The only way to have the same poles on both sides is to use only maths (the odd and even sub-series) on the right, and to avoid the maths pole on the left. Therefore this left side must embed an action that results in the apparition of the factor maths in the generating function. But this factor codes for the action maths acting over sequences: the left member is necessarily a linear combination of the sequences obtained by shifting the sequence maths.

Applied to the (genuine) Fibonacci sequence, this proves that the only combination of squares that can be linearized are those build upon maths by shifts and linear combinations. For example, the expression maths, whose generating function is

maths

cannot be linearized due to the presence of pole maths.


previous up next
Previous: 2 Notations and elementary Up: Is the Fibonacci Sequence Next: 4 Complements


douillet@ensait.fr
2005-03-18