We will now examine what happens when the customer flow increases and the number of servers increases accordingly. When the flow is not Poisson, the way that this increase is modeled has to be specified. In any case, the very fact of pooling has a strong influence over the sojourn time, at least because the variance of inter-arrivals for each server is strongly modified.
If we assume that "only the flow" is changed, the
new pdf of arrivals is
.
The global shape parameters are kept, and among them the squared variation
coefficient (
) of the global arrivals. Let
,
and
be the mgf of respectively
,
and the arrival process in a single queue. When using
rand, some elementary algebra leads to :
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The fact that greater
leads to better performances is even more
clear for the remaining policies. When using robn,
holds : at the limit, only the
of the services will contribute
to the waiting process. When using fast, the distribution of
the number of customers staying in the system is independent of the
flow itself, but only depends on the shape parameters. Therefore,
according to Little's formula, the mean sojourn is divided by
.
|